<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Twingly Top 100 Blogs and BlogRank</title> <atom:link href="http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/</link> <description>Your Daily Internet News Magazine</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:37:02 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: jimmy s</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/#comment-621</link> <dc:creator>jimmy s</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1617#comment-621</guid> <description>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &quot;ranking websites&quot;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.htmlurlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#039;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &#8220;ranking websites&#8221;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:</p><p><a
href="http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html</a></p><p>urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#8217;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jimmy s</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/#comment-8676</link> <dc:creator>jimmy s</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1617#comment-8676</guid> <description>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &quot;ranking websites&quot;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.htmlurlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#039;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &#8220;ranking websites&#8221;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:</p><p><a
href="http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html</a></p><p>urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#8217;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 6/6 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 634/634 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.blippitt.com @ 2012-02-13 03:08:19 -->
