<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twingly Top 100 Blogs and BlogRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/</link>
	<description>The Viral News HQ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy s</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1617#comment-621</guid>
		<description>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &quot;ranking websites&quot;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:

http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html

urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#039;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &#8220;ranking websites&#8221;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html</a></p>
<p>urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#8217;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy s</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/#comment-8676</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1617#comment-8676</guid>
		<description>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &quot;ranking websites&quot;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:

http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html

urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#039;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to &#8220;ranking websites&#8221;. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html</a></p>
<p>urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It&#8217;s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blippitt.com/twingly-top-100-blogs-and-blogrank/feed/ ) in 0.24344 seconds, on May 27th, 2012 at 7:10 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 27th, 2012 at 7:15 am UTC -->
