<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sniffing Some Glue? Yahoo Brings &#8220;Glue Pages&#8221; to U.S.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.blippitt.com/sniffing-some-glue-yahoo-brings-glue-pages-to-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.blippitt.com/sniffing-some-glue-yahoo-brings-glue-pages-to-us/</link> <description>Your Daily Internet News Magazine</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:37:02 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/sniffing-some-glue-yahoo-brings-glue-pages-to-us/#comment-462</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1080#comment-462</guid> <description>Some good points there, Randall.  Thanks for posting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good points there, Randall.  Thanks for posting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/sniffing-some-glue-yahoo-brings-glue-pages-to-us/#comment-8573</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1080#comment-8573</guid> <description>Some good points there, Randall.  Thanks for posting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good points there, Randall.  Thanks for posting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Randall Gniadecki</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/sniffing-some-glue-yahoo-brings-glue-pages-to-us/#comment-463</link> <dc:creator>Randall Gniadecki</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1080#comment-463</guid> <description>ChrisYahoo keeps trying to do something new and different when really they need to just become better than Google at one thing if they want to get real market share for search advertising dollars. If Yahoo spent half the time on Yahoo! SM that they spent on developing new things that will be introduced with fanfare and then die off quietly in six months perhaps they could actually beat Google. It&#039;s the only way their stock price will improve, improved revenue and taking some of the ad spend away from Google. If you have ever used the Yahoo! SM interface...it&#039;s clunky to say the least, and way too many features that Google makes it easy to use are so well hidden away in Yahoo that you need to call them just to find it.
This just looks like another attempt to get more search share, when if they just improved Yahoo! Search Marketing they could leverage their current share much better. I would spend a lot more of my clients&#039; budgets on Yahoo if it didn&#039;t take 2-3 times the amount of time to do anything in the account. It&#039;s all about ROI, and Yahoo does not seem to have their eye on the prize.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p><p>Yahoo keeps trying to do something new and different when really they need to just become better than Google at one thing if they want to get real market share for search advertising dollars. If Yahoo spent half the time on Yahoo! SM that they spent on developing new things that will be introduced with fanfare and then die off quietly in six months perhaps they could actually beat Google. It&#8217;s the only way their stock price will improve, improved revenue and taking some of the ad spend away from Google. If you have ever used the Yahoo! SM interface&#8230;it&#8217;s clunky to say the least, and way too many features that Google makes it easy to use are so well hidden away in Yahoo that you need to call them just to find it.<br
/> This just looks like another attempt to get more search share, when if they just improved Yahoo! Search Marketing they could leverage their current share much better. I would spend a lot more of my clients&#8217; budgets on Yahoo if it didn&#8217;t take 2-3 times the amount of time to do anything in the account. It&#8217;s all about ROI, and Yahoo does not seem to have their eye on the prize.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Randall Gniadecki</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/sniffing-some-glue-yahoo-brings-glue-pages-to-us/#comment-8574</link> <dc:creator>Randall Gniadecki</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1080#comment-8574</guid> <description>ChrisYahoo keeps trying to do something new and different when really they need to just become better than Google at one thing if they want to get real market share for search advertising dollars. If Yahoo spent half the time on Yahoo! SM that they spent on developing new things that will be introduced with fanfare and then die off quietly in six months perhaps they could actually beat Google. It&#039;s the only way their stock price will improve, improved revenue and taking some of the ad spend away from Google. If you have ever used the Yahoo! SM interface...it&#039;s clunky to say the least, and way too many features that Google makes it easy to use are so well hidden away in Yahoo that you need to call them just to find it.
This just looks like another attempt to get more search share, when if they just improved Yahoo! Search Marketing they could leverage their current share much better. I would spend a lot more of my clients&#039; budgets on Yahoo if it didn&#039;t take 2-3 times the amount of time to do anything in the account. It&#039;s all about ROI, and Yahoo does not seem to have their eye on the prize.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p><p>Yahoo keeps trying to do something new and different when really they need to just become better than Google at one thing if they want to get real market share for search advertising dollars. If Yahoo spent half the time on Yahoo! SM that they spent on developing new things that will be introduced with fanfare and then die off quietly in six months perhaps they could actually beat Google. It&#8217;s the only way their stock price will improve, improved revenue and taking some of the ad spend away from Google. If you have ever used the Yahoo! SM interface&#8230;it&#8217;s clunky to say the least, and way too many features that Google makes it easy to use are so well hidden away in Yahoo that you need to call them just to find it.<br
/> This just looks like another attempt to get more search share, when if they just improved Yahoo! Search Marketing they could leverage their current share much better. I would spend a lot more of my clients&#8217; budgets on Yahoo if it didn&#8217;t take 2-3 times the amount of time to do anything in the account. It&#8217;s all about ROI, and Yahoo does not seem to have their eye on the prize.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 6/6 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 652/652 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.blippitt.com @ 2012-02-13 07:36:15 -->
