http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list Entertainment News | Celebrity News | Viral Video | Tech News | Odd News Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:09:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list/comment-page-1#comment-5216 Sneezy Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:57:19 +0000 http://www.blippitt.com/?p=10502#comment-5216 Agreed - this is the only place I've found the list - thank you. Agreed – this is the only place I've found the list – thank you.

]]> http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list/comment-page-1#comment-2735 Sneezy Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:57:19 +0000 http://www.blippitt.com/?p=10502#comment-2735 Agreed - this is the only place I've found the list - thank you. Agreed – this is the only place I've found the list – thank you.

]]> http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list/comment-page-1#comment-2728 Nearly 700 post offices may close or consolidate; 24 in Chicago area | The Rock River Times Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:41:15 +0000 http://www.blippitt.com/?p=10502#comment-2728 [...] PRC list of candidates for closure can be found at : http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list WHAT TO DO [...] [...] PRC list of candidates for closure can be found at : http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list WHAT TO DO [...]

]]> http://www.blippitt.com/postal-regulatory-commission-post-office-closures-list/comment-page-1#comment-2724 Tammy Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:34:22 +0000 http://www.blippitt.com/?p=10502#comment-2724 THANK YOU for having the whole list here. As usual, the government has looked before it leapt, and nothing is available at any of the links leading to their site for the Postal Regulatory Commission. They have been too swamped, I guess, to keep up. None of the links I have tried has been able to get through, so I am so pleased to finally see the list posted elsewhere. This is the only place I have found it available. As a postal employee, I have been concerned, naturally, since word got out that this information was available. You would think that they would have anticipated being swamped with visitors and prepared for it, but, no, this is a government entity we are talking about, so, as usual, it is leap before you look, not look before you leap, because that would just make too much sense. I personally think they should do away with some of the managers positions at these offices; they are completely unnecessary, could save a ton of money, and could relieve the workers headaches caused by too many cooks in the kitchen, too many chiefs in charge, take your pick of euphemisms, they all apply. Also, those yearly bonuses they pay out could probably save a few million or so, but then we wouldn't want to take those away from those poor, underpaid postmasters, now would we? Just my thoughts from the trenches. THANK YOU for having the whole list here. As usual, the government has looked before it leapt, and nothing is available at any of the links leading to their site for the Postal Regulatory Commission. They have been too swamped, I guess, to keep up. None of the links I have tried has been able to get through, so I am so pleased to finally see the list posted elsewhere. This is the only place I have found it available. As a postal employee, I have been concerned, naturally, since word got out that this information was available. You would think that they would have anticipated being swamped with visitors and prepared for it, but, no, this is a government entity we are talking about, so, as usual, it is leap before you look, not look before you leap, because that would just make too much sense. I personally think they should do away with some of the managers positions at these offices; they are completely unnecessary, could save a ton of money, and could relieve the workers headaches caused by too many cooks in the kitchen, too many chiefs in charge, take your pick of euphemisms, they all apply. Also, those yearly bonuses they pay out could probably save a few million or so, but then we wouldn't want to take those away from those poor, underpaid postmasters, now would we? Just my thoughts from the trenches.

]]>