<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google SearchWiki: Why?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.blippitt.com/google-searchwiki-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.blippitt.com/google-searchwiki-why/</link> <description>Your Daily Internet News Magazine</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:37:02 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Poof! Google SearchWiki Is Gone &#124; Monty's Mega Marketing</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/google-searchwiki-why/#comment-475</link> <dc:creator>Poof! Google SearchWiki Is Gone &#124; Monty's Mega Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:11:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1095#comment-475</guid> <description>[...] was not a big fan of it anyway, but I&#8217;m surprised to see it vanish so [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was not a big fan of it anyway, but I&#8217;m surprised to see it vanish so [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sweetdeal</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/google-searchwiki-why/#comment-476</link> <dc:creator>sweetdeal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1095#comment-476</guid> <description>does anybody think that this brand new search option from google will change the way websites are ranked within google? I wonder if this will change the way results are displayed for large/profitable keywords very much? i found an overview of how the google searchwiki works at http://www.thesearchwiki.com for anybody who has not seen what the new google search results look like with searchwiki.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anybody think that this brand new search option from google will change the way websites are ranked within google? I wonder if this will change the way results are displayed for large/profitable keywords very much? i found an overview of how the google searchwiki works at <a
href="http://www.thesearchwiki.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesearchwiki.com</a> for anybody who has not seen what the new google search results look like with searchwiki.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sweetdeal</title><link>http://www.blippitt.com/google-searchwiki-why/#comment-8586</link> <dc:creator>sweetdeal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=1095#comment-8586</guid> <description>does anybody think that this brand new search option from google will change the way websites are ranked within google? I wonder if this will change the way results are displayed for large/profitable keywords very much? i found an overview of how the google searchwiki works at http://www.thesearchwiki.com for anybody who has not seen what the new google search results look like with searchwiki.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anybody think that this brand new search option from google will change the way websites are ranked within google? I wonder if this will change the way results are displayed for large/profitable keywords very much? i found an overview of how the google searchwiki works at <a
href="http://www.thesearchwiki.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesearchwiki.com</a> for anybody who has not seen what the new google search results look like with searchwiki.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 6/6 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 645/645 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.blippitt.com @ 2012-02-13 01:59:03 -->
