<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carrie Prejean: Miss California Title Could Be Stripped</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/</link>
	<description>The Viral News HQ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: bilutza</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/#comment-5212</link>
		<dc:creator>bilutza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=6859#comment-5212</guid>
		<description>Her answer was incoherent..... Whether one marries the same sex or the opposite sex isn&#039;t a choice. Being gay isn&#039;t a choice, and therefore, one DESIRES to love and marry the same gender. Straight marriage is a right and same sex marriage is not. That&#039;s the issue. That was the question. She answered it incoherently and that&#039;s why she lost.&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot;href=&quot;http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;marire sani&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her answer was incoherent&#8230;.. Whether one marries the same sex or the opposite sex isn&#39;t a choice. Being gay isn&#39;t a choice, and therefore, one DESIRES to love and marry the same gender. Straight marriage is a right and same sex marriage is not. That&#39;s the issue. That was the question. She answered it incoherently and that&#39;s why she lost.<a rel="follow"href="http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/" rel="nofollow">marire sani</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilutza</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>bilutza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=6859#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>Her answer was incoherent..... Whether one marries the same sex or the opposite sex isn&#039;t a choice. Being gay isn&#039;t a choice, and therefore, one DESIRES to love and marry the same gender. Straight marriage is a right and same sex marriage is not. That&#039;s the issue. That was the question. She answered it incoherently and that&#039;s why she lost.&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot;href=&quot;http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;marire sani&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her answer was incoherent&#8230;.. Whether one marries the same sex or the opposite sex isn&#39;t a choice. Being gay isn&#39;t a choice, and therefore, one DESIRES to love and marry the same gender. Straight marriage is a right and same sex marriage is not. That&#39;s the issue. That was the question. She answered it incoherently and that&#39;s why she lost.<a rel="follow"href="http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/" rel="nofollow">marire sani</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carhartt</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Carhartt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=6859#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>Not stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=6859#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>Its not surprising that Carrie was stripped of her title. They could not do it openly just based on her comments, so they split hairs to find a way of doing it with the appearance of a justification. Trump makes himself out as though this was something &#039;unacceptable&#039; she did he was &#039;forced&#039; to do, however, Mr Trump, we are intelligent and can read between the lines, and will not be fooled by these kinds of &#039;tactics&#039;. You got rid of her because she was not serving your political interests and those of whom are with you....simple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not surprising that Carrie was stripped of her title. They could not do it openly just based on her comments, so they split hairs to find a way of doing it with the appearance of a justification. Trump makes himself out as though this was something &#39;unacceptable&#39; she did he was &#39;forced&#39; to do, however, Mr Trump, we are intelligent and can read between the lines, and will not be fooled by these kinds of &#39;tactics&#39;. You got rid of her because she was not serving your political interests and those of whom are with you&#8230;.simple&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>Not stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=6859#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>Its not surprising that Carrie was stripped of her title. They could not do it openly just based on her comments, so they split hairs to find a way of doing it with the appearance of a justification. Trump makes himself out as though this was something &#039;unacceptable&#039; she did he was &#039;forced&#039; to do, however, Mr Trump, we are intelligent and can read between the lines, and will not be fooled by these kinds of &#039;tactics&#039;. You got rid of her because she was not serving your political interests and those of whom are with you....simple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not surprising that Carrie was stripped of her title. They could not do it openly just based on her comments, so they split hairs to find a way of doing it with the appearance of a justification. Trump makes himself out as though this was something &#39;unacceptable&#39; she did he was &#39;forced&#39; to do, however, Mr Trump, we are intelligent and can read between the lines, and will not be fooled by these kinds of &#39;tactics&#39;. You got rid of her because she was not serving your political interests and those of whom are with you&#8230;.simple&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Prejean Photos Heat up the Web, Miss California Defends Her Actions &#124; Blippitt</title>
		<link>http://www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Prejean Photos Heat up the Web, Miss California Defends Her Actions &#124; Blippitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blippitt.com/?p=6859#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: It now looks like Carrie Prejean could be stripped of her title. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: It now looks like Carrie Prejean could be stripped of her title. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blippitt.com/carrie-prejean-miss-california-title-could-be-stripped/feed/ ) in 0.24054 seconds, on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:06 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:11 pm UTC -->
